|
The Leader of the Labour Group in Leeds,
Councillor Keith Wakefield has hit out today at the Council’s plan
to remove funding from East Leeds Family Learning Centre in
Seacroft and urged the authority to think again.
The Tory/Lib Dem administration running the
Council recently decided to withdraw over £6m of funding that was
set aside for improvements to the centre on Brooklands View in
Seacroft. The money has been placed in a contingency fund to be
used in case of emergency.
Councillor Wakefield has hit out at this
decision as it means that adult classes are no longer taking place
at the centre, which help people living in this very disadvantaged
part of the city to find jobs.
Councillor Keith Wakefield (Leader of
Leeds Labour Group) said: “I am disgusted that
this funding has been removed from East Leeds Family Learning
Centre. This centre provides a vital service to
people living in this area. We should be
increasing the range of services offered by the centre, not cutting
them.
“This is one of the most deprived parts of
the city with very high level of unemployment and lots of families
on benefits. The courses offered by the centre
have given a lot of people the skills they need to find a
job. Something they may have struggled to do had
these courses not taken place.
“Councillor Richard Brett has claimed that
the Tory/Lib Dem administration treat all parts of the city
equally. Decisions like this one make it even
harder to have any faith in these claims.
“It is
disgraceful that the people living in this area have to lose out
because the Tories and Lib Dems who are running the Council cannot
balance their budgets.”
Councillor Graham Hyde (Labour,
Killingbeck & Seacroft Ward) said: “The centre has helped many people to get the qualifications
and skills they need to find a job. Many of the
staff working at Tesco received training at East Leeds Family
Learning Centre which helped them get their
jobs.
Unfortunately there are many other people
in East Leeds who need the kind of training offered at the
centre. This decision means they will have to
travel to another part of the city to access it, something that is
simply not an option for many people living in this
area.
|